What is God?
It turns out, there is something just like that in my 3D morality map. Freeists.
Freeists are the highest kind of being. They have self-interest, and true-care. A freeist with equal true-care to self-interest, would be the highest kind of being. Because all innocent beings (including freeists) agree with each other, they become ultimately strong.
Each freeist isn't God. It would be "the sum-total of all freeists", together, that is God. Each freeist person alone, would be an infinitessimally small part of God.
And because they have self-interest and true-care, they don't need anyone else to help them to exist. They create all the meaning in life, by themselves.
However, it turns out it's not as simple as that. It's not just as simple as "having equal true-care to self-interest".
CAN you have equal true-care to self-interest? Absolutely equal? Across all of infinite space and time, for all beings that exist? It's not possible. It's just a mathematical equation, but we aren't equations, we are real beings, with souls, we can't be precisely aligned to an equation. (By "we", I mean anyone with a soul.)
It is possible to come close, however. To have, almost equal true-care to self-interest. Or even better, to have "sometimes more true-care than self-interest, and sometimes less".
So it's like there's a line, a line of perfection that can't be reached. And shouldn't be reached, because its just maths, not reality. And you can have a freeist who is "Standing on the line, but part of each foot is on both sides of the line." He is 99 to 101% innocent.
This means, that you can have freeists who have more true-care than self-interest (slightly angelic freeists, 101% innocent), or freeists with less true-care than self-interest. (slightly selfish freeists 99% innocent). Or freeists who are BOTH... slightly angelic and slightly selfish! (99-101%).
Beings with less true-care than self-interest, need beings with more true-care than self-interest, to give them meaning. To help them function. And beings with more true-care than self-interest, need others also! To give them purpose! Or else they want to help others but have no one to help!
Basically... from my theory and experiences, it seems like the exact definition of God, as a "class of being that needs no other class of being to exist", actually can't exist. Basically, the exact definition of God, can't exist, according to my theory. BUT, we have something close, and more realistic.
Interestingly though... it still works like that for those 99-101% innocent freeists. They need others to help give them meaning, but they also help give others meaning. Their imperfections balance out, to make them perfect.
However, being 99% innocent, isn't enough. A freeist who is 99-101% innocent, will eventually change himself to be just 101% innocent. How? He needs to add natural-respect to himself.
It's not that he causes problems. He doesn't. Freeists are so great, including 99% innocent ones and ones even less innocent. But he can suffer from unfair situations that "lock" him into a negative state. A "false test" in other words.
Is this still "God"? Why would "God" change himself, to improve himself?
It is however, the highest kind of being, the most powerful and intense kind of being, that my theory predicts...